<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Happy Web Diva &#187; Communications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.happywebdiva.com/category/communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.happywebdiva.com</link>
	<description>Musings of Anna Belle Leiserson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Guidelines for Corporate Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/05/04/guidelines-for-corporate-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/05/04/guidelines-for-corporate-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/05/04/guidelines-for-corporate-blogging/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently wrote some comment guidelines for the primary site I manage, and was surprised by the paucity of information on this topic. Of course you&#8217;ll pull up thousands of entries if you do a Google search. But I wanted authoritative, meaty stuff. In fact, what I most wanted was a book covering the topic. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently wrote some <a href="http://www.vicc.org/nav/guidelines-comments.php">comment guidelines for the primary site I manage</a>, and was surprised by the paucity of information on this topic.  Of course you&#8217;ll pull up thousands of entries if you do a Google search.  But I wanted authoritative, meaty stuff.</p>
<p>In fact, what I most wanted was a book covering the topic.  However, neither of the blogging books I own did.  One is even on corporate blogging.</p>
<p>The implication is that guidelines don&#8217;t matter that much &#8212; that things like search engine optimization are what&#8217;s really important.  For many blogs, I expect that&#8217;s true, but not all.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used to manage a dicey blog (now history) where guidelines were a lifesaver.   Early in that blog&#8217;s life, I opened my email one day and discovered about ten comments submitted the previous evening by one person.  The first four were flames, but then came the fifth.  It began, &#8220;I just read your guidelines&#8230;.&#8221; and proceeded to be quite rational, even calm, after that, suggesting that I not post his earlier comments.</p>
<p>For others looking for meta guidelines, I did happen across one helpful summary.  It&#8217;s several years old, but cuts to the chase with four rules used by all of the corporate blogging guidelines they reviewed:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li> You&#8217;re personally responsible</li>
<li>Abide by existing rules</li>
<li>Keep secrets</li>
<li>Be nice</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>From</strong>: <a href="http://www.corporateblogging.info/2005/06/policies-compared-todays-corporate.asp">Policies compared: Today&#8217;s corporate blogging rules</a></p></blockquote>
<p>If your gut is telling you write guidelines, pay attention.  Even though I couldn&#8217;t easily find a subject authority, there are plenty of good examples found with a quick search.  Just add a dollop of common sense, and you should come up with something that will help you sleep better at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/05/04/guidelines-for-corporate-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Non-Stressed Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/04/10/the-non-stressed-blogger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/04/10/the-non-stressed-blogger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knitting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/04/10/the-non-stressed-blogger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geez louise. I keep forgetting to blog. I read a number of stories over the weekend about bloggers who get so stressed they have heart attacks or worse, but that&#8217;s obviously not a problem for some of us. I expect it&#8217;s mostly confined to those who are A-list or A-list-wannabes. What&#8217;s the secret to my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.happywebdiva.com/images/knitting.jpg" alt="Knitting" class="right" align="right" border="0" height="185" width="190" />Geez louise.  I keep forgetting to blog.  I read a number of stories over the weekend about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/technology/06sweat.html">bloggers who get so stressed</a> they have heart attacks or worse, but that&#8217;s obviously not a problem for some of us.  I expect it&#8217;s mostly confined to those who are A-list or A-list-wannabes.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the secret to my success &#8230; in maintaining blogging health and sanity, I mean?   Of all things (at least for now) it&#8217;s knitting.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t knit for almost 30 years.  I became moderately proficient at it in my early 20s, but then life (babies, etc.) intervened &#8212; plus I don&#8217;t like clutter, and crafts are incredibly clutter-inducing.</p>
<p>So what happened?  Why the return?  I&#8217;m not quite sure.  A friend mentioned her favorite yarn shop, I happened to be near it the next day, waltzed in, got some yarn, next got a chatty e-newsletter from them, and even signed up for a class.</p>
<p>Now most evenings I can&#8217;t wait for a little knitting and <em>Star Trek</em> with Mr. Web Diva.  Bliss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/04/10/the-non-stressed-blogger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cell Phones More Important Than Internet, TV and Email</title>
		<link>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/03/18/cell-phones-more-important-than-internet-tv-and-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/03/18/cell-phones-more-important-than-internet-tv-and-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/03/18/cell-phones-more-important-than-internet-tv-and-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holy Batphone. According to the latest Pew Internet &#38; American Life Project, cell phones matter more to U.S. adults than the internet, TV and email. &#8220;When asked how hard it would be to give up a specific technology, respondents are now most likely to say the cell phone would be most difficult to do without, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy Batphone.   According to the latest <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/244/report_display.asp">Pew Internet &amp; American Life Projec</a>t, cell phones matter more to U.S. adults than the internet, TV and email.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When asked how hard it would be to give up a specific technology, respondents are now most likely to say the cell phone would be most difficult to do without, followed by the internet, TV, and landline telephone. This represents a sharp reversal in how people viewed these technologies in 2002.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Add to that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/technology/14apple.html?ex=1358053200&amp;en=83084885cfc604cf&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">central role web browsing plays for iPhone users</a>, not to mention Google Android, and I wonder &#8212; how can any self-respecting web diva not be riveted by cell phones?  Right after the iPhone was released, I figured my interest would morph from a hobby to a critical professional skill, but now I&#8217;m wondering just how soon that will be.  Six months?  One year?  I can&#8217;t imagine it will be as long as two years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/03/18/cell-phones-more-important-than-internet-tv-and-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Church Communications 101</title>
		<link>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/02/16/church-communications-101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/02/16/church-communications-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/02/16/church-communications-101/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The greatest problem with communication is the illusion that it has been accomplished.&#8221; &#8211; George Bernard Shaw This morning my church sponsored a most helpful &#8220;Getting the Word Out&#8221; workshop for church leaders (board members, committee chairs, staff, etc.). Based on introductory comments, here is a &#8220;Cheat Sheet&#8221; of things to consider when you want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;The greatest problem with communication is the illusion that it has been accomplished.&#8221;<br />
<em>&#8211; George Bernard Shaw</em></p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://www.happywebdiva.com/images/7.png" alt="7" class="right" align="right" border="0" height="104" width="100" />This morning my church sponsored a most helpful &#8220;Getting the Word Out&#8221; workshop for church leaders (board members, committee chairs, staff, etc.). Based on introductory comments, here is a &#8220;Cheat Sheet&#8221; of things to consider when you want to communicate your church event.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Remember the number seven.</strong>  If you want the majority of your congregation to hear about your event, you&#8217;re going to need to publicize it seven times.  Saying it once doesn&#8217;t even begin to get the word out.</li>
<li><strong>Cover the basics.</strong>  It seems obvious, but you&#8217;d be amazed how easy it is to forget some of these, especially if you&#8217;re in a hurry.
<ul>
<li>Who?</li>
<li>What?</li>
<li>When?</li>
<li>Where?</li>
<li>Why?</li>
<li>How?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Be clear about your audiences.</strong>  Possibilities include:
<ul>
<li>Current congregation members</li>
<li>Newcomers</li>
<li>Prospective members</li>
<li>Visitors</li>
<li>The larger community</li>
<li>The media</li>
<li>The denomination</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Pick your communication methods wisely.</strong> Keep in mind your audiences, your message and that number  seven.  These will affect which methods are best.   At my church, the primary possibilities are:
<ul>
<li>The newsletter</li>
<li>The church website, particularly the announcement blog</li>
<li>The weekly email</li>
<li>The order of service</li>
<li>An announcement from the pulpit</li>
<li>A press release</li>
<li>The bulletin boards</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Remember: effective communication is not simple.</strong>  In fact the technology I adore is making it ever more complicated, or so it seems.    What, I wonder, would George Bernard Shaw, make of Web 2.0?</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/02/16/church-communications-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Good Humored Greening of Communications</title>
		<link>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/01/20/the-good-humored-greening-of-communications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/01/20/the-good-humored-greening-of-communications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Belle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/01/20/the-good-humored-greening-of-communications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I was (happily) a bystander in one of those interactions that are so prevalent in smallish volunteer organizations coping with the new media. Out of the blue, my church&#8217;s Green Team (our environmental conscience) got an email from someone no one had heard of before, telling them they should &#8220;champion, promote and implement the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.happywebdiva.com/images/junk-mail.gif" alt="Mail" class="left" align="left" border="0" height="144" width="225" />Yesterday I was (happily) a bystander in one of those interactions that are so prevalent in smallish volunteer organizations coping with the new media.  Out of the blue, my church&#8217;s Green Team (our environmental conscience) got an email from someone no one had heard of before, telling them they should &#8220;champion, promote and implement the conversion of our tree eating, postage wasting newsletter to an internet version.&#8221;  Yikes.</p>
<p>Astonishingly, our very kind and patient Green Team co-chair bristled and let the person have it.  She noted that they were just a small group of volunteers who didn&#8217;t have a magic want. Then other church leaders weighed in, pointing out, for example, that online actually is the primary mode of distributing the newsletter.</p>
<p>Eventually the thread made it to the Communication Committee (AKA Comm Comm). It&#8217;s where newsletter responsibility actually lies.   Comm Comm is a sizable group, full of older, less-than-reticent members, and at that point, there was much hilarity.  Thank heavens.  It was absolutely the right response.  We&#8217;ve been down the online-vs.-print road goodness knows how many times in the last few years.  If I could have an ounce of chocolate for every hour Comm Comm has spent talking about and working on this issue, I&#8217;d be a very fat diva.</p>
<p>Yet still there is so much to see and learn from this kind of interaction.  The take-aways for me right now are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Humans yearn for the simple.  Alas, the shift into new media is anything but simple.</li>
<li>Volunteers are fragile.  They are at risk for lack of appreciation, and having a healthy, vibrant community to disperse such issues into is a wonderful antidote.</li>
<li>Good humor can save the day when dealing with complex issues mixed with tender feelings.</li>
</ul>
<p>What do you take away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.happywebdiva.com/2008/01/20/the-good-humored-greening-of-communications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
